I admit it, sometimes I myself feel a little bit conflicted
over the gun control debate. Not that I own any guns, or plan on gun ownership
in the near future, but I do happen to see the valid points on each side of the
debate. The further we go into this debate, since the horrid massacre in
Newtown, the more I find it difficult to even feel remotely sympathetic to
those opposed to stricter gun control laws. The facts aside for the moment, sane
leadership opposed to gun control seems to be going right out the window.
Let us even disregard the antics of Wayne LaPierre for a
moment. Mike Leara, Republican state representative of Missouri, has decided to
sponsor a bill that would actually make it a class D felony for anyone to
propose legislation “that further restricts and individual’s right to bear
arms.” It would be a felony for a representative to simply do their job in
attempting to further public safety. Believe it or not, Missouri isn’t the
first state to pull a scheme like this! While Vice President Biden was spending
some time in Virginia speaking about the Obama administrations plan for gun
control, the Virginia House of Delegates was in the process of approving a bill
that prohibits state agencies and employees from enforcing new measures of
control. And, apparently, Tennessee, Texas, Mississippi, and Wyoming have all
made their own plans to make it a criminal offense for their employees to
enforce the federal statute.
Our country is, obviously, divided to a point that could
cause some serious harm to it. Everyone, at times on both sides of the
political spectrum, seems to be acting out of fear and irrationality, and we
seem to be drifting far away from the main points and the facts, which I hope
to have time to speak to in a later post. Firearms are unlike any other product
on the market. Their sole purpose is to kill, and they are designed
accordingly, but the founders of this country felt that there was at least some
need, at least in their rime, to allow American citizens to own firearms. In
today’s world of warfare it is simply foolish to believe that a firearm will
protect you from the tyranny of government, but, in some instances, a firearm
can serve as a means of protection from others or, at times, a plain and simple
tool of death and destruction. There needs to be balance. Other countries in
our peer group have managed this issue relatively simply; can we not reach that
point as well?
In order to reach a point where this debate does not become
a good ol’ fashioned liberal feeding frenzy and good, solid, quality decisions
that satisfy the American public and provide public safety are reached, we
desperately NEED quality leaders on both sides of the fence to admit that there
is a problem and we must come together as a nation to fix it. The same being
true for all issues in this country.
LH
No comments:
Post a Comment